Label
Maek@J
Feb 21
Rating:   10
Revisit Warren

I listened to Sen Warren’s interview , again . Following the Nevada dem senate, I’m changing my mind about Warren- for the better. Choice staff, bring Warren back. I see she has moderated her view on Medicare or at least a phase in which most people don’t understand. I hear a less radical leader in Warren vs a Very radical Bernie who will loose to Trump. We need to hear more from Elizabeth

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
ashy.aspen
Feb 12
Rating:   10
Great podcast

People acting as if the editorial board is NYT news. They’re people, they have opinions and want to endorse the candidate *they* think is good. That’s the point and has nothing to do with their news section.Along those lines, these were very informing of things that don’t get asked a lot. People seem to act as if “catching the candidates off guard” is more important. And again, that’s kind of the point. These reporters know these candidates and their positions very well. They aren’t asking them to make their case to them, they’re asking to answer the questions that they feel still haven’t been answered even through all of the rallies and speeches and debates. Things that may be overlooked.All in all, it’s a great podcast and it’s a shame people misunderstand the intentions behind it and shame it for “bias”. WELL worth the listen.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
bugaboo2971
Feb 11
Rating:   6
Just fine

The editorial board seemed more interested in catching the candidates off guard than having a substantive discussion

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
Nsparksss
Feb 7
Rating:   4
Meh

The board shows a significant lack of understanding of where the American populace is politically and economically. Their observations, questions, and analysis make clear that they don’t understand why, or how, our current dumpster-fire-in-chief was elected. If you want John Delaney’s hot takes on the upcoming presidential election, be sure to listen to the board, and remember, it’s better to not try for any real change and just keep moving to the right with the republicans 😊.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
Cocobunny777
Feb 7
Rating:   2
I was looking for a conversation, not “gotcha” journalism

If this is how interviews are normally conducted at the NYTimes, I may have to consider canceling my subscription. How is it good journalism to immediately put the candidate on the defensive the second the interview starts? They don’t post the whole interview but they do have time to overlay judge-y dialogue between questions. I am an undecided voter and I was hoping to have a better idea of who the candidates are as people, what their platforms are, what their plans are. Most of the questions went along the lines of “we heard you say/do this thing that makes you sound like a terrible person, what do you have to say for yourself?” I want here the plans and decide on those please! What’s past is past, I don’t care about what happened 20-sum years ago. I want to hear their plans for fixing this broken system.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
kokakoba
Feb 7
Rating:   4
Some silver linings

Their neoliberal agenda is clear. So take everything from NYT’s with a grain of salt. They are just as biased as Fox News. The only reason I give them 4 stars is cuz i like Interview of Bernie- the juxtaposition of His authenticity and integrity with the passive-aggressive and disingenuous NYT’s editorial board is moving. The other interviews are a joke.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
El220
Feb 5
Rating:   4
Disappointed

Completely biased- and evident in the questions asked. I love the idea of this podcast and I think it holds so much potential. Instead I’m left disappointed. Like other reviewers mentioned, no endorsement was made. Doesn’t help that during the deliberation, they tend to talk over each other and I have to replay moments just to understand what was being said/argued by each person. Overall, Could be better.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
Jennuhlex
Feb 4
Rating:   4
Not worth the listen

This was so freaking pretentious. I’m still an undecided voter, but I did decide to never waste my time on another NYT podcast.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
wkendgranny
Feb 4
Rating:   6
Interesting but....

The panel comes across as very anti-Midwest, as well as elitist and condescending.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
Label
a father 04931605395973279
Feb 3
Rating:   8
Release the full interviews

I want to see The NY Times release the full audio interviews in the future. If you are going to release a full transcript, why not release the full audio and let us judge for ourselves? Please do not underestimate your listeners capacity to understand long form discussion. I find it hard to bear some of the topics and I think the discussions can go a bit long, but that is why I am here, listening to a podcast and not sound bites. Editing seems very suspicious to me. Let us judge.

Reviewed on Apple Podcasts
0:00 / 0:00