I wish it were more of a conversation.
Q is trying to engage with important topics of our day and have a meaningful conversation about them, which I applaud. However, the first couple of episodes about “The Gay Conversation” have been fairly one sided in terms of people holding the traditional view of sexuality vs. and affirming view. I appreciate the hosts using several clips of voices from theologians, non-theologians, pastors, etc, but I find that these clips often too short and I feel they may run the risk of being taken out of context. In episode 3, about theology regarding “The Gay Conversation” I think that it would have been helpful to have had someone in studio or on a call who could explain the affirming view. I don’t think that it was explained as thoroughly and robustly as it should have been. It was very disappointing to me. I came to this hoping to hear a conversation on both sides and left hearing a pretty one sided affair. I hope this improves down the line.
Reviewed on Apple Podcasts