More/better science reviews, please.
The reviews of science about health, nutrition, and enhancement is great. Dr. Brianna Stubbs’ content is by far the best. It gets into the details of experimental design, findings, and admits of limitations—it’s superior to most of the interview, product, and company discussions. I hope HVMN can find someone to fill Dr. Stubbs role in the podcast. (I’m on the market; 😉)Some pet-peeves:- Startup lingo. “So how’d your company get into this space?” “...disrupting the market.” Not sure why it bothers me, but it does.- Selection of evidence. Sometimes I get the sense that the podcast celebrates findings that support its business interests and casts skepticism on findings that challenge its business interests. One way to dispel this sense would be to do what Dr. Stubbs does by getting into the weeds of a wide range of evidence, acknowledging limitations, admitting potentially business-undermining implications, and proposing specific studies that would decisively show the good/bad use cases of protocols.
Reviewed on Apple Podcasts